Emergency behavior

Inquiry 17 (1-4):43 – 47 (1974)
Abstract
There is a class of actions — reflex actions — which seem not to spring from any intention, but for which we nevertheless wish to take responsibility. It is suggested that these actions are appropriately said to be done intentionally, in spite of our never having an intention to do them. And this grammatical anomaly indicates that the behavior in question requires a special kind of account; one which might be characterized as derivative: parasitic on the more paradigmatic sort of action explanation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,948
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Larry Wright (1972). Explanation and Teleology. Philosophy of Science 39 (2):204-218.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert E. Moore (1979). Refraining. Philosophical Studies 36 (4):407 - 424.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-03-05

Total downloads

8 ( #169,667 of 1,100,779 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #176,465 of 1,100,779 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.