Graduate studies at Western
Acta Analytica 27 (2):113-126 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract Can the wise person be fooled? The Stoics take a very strong view on this question, holding that the wise person (or sage) is never deceived and never believes anything that is false. This seems to be an implausibly strong claim, but it follows directly from some basic tenets of the Stoic cognitive and psychological world-view. In developing an account of what wisdom really requires, I will explore the tenets of the Stoic view that lead to this infallibilism about wisdom, and show that many of the elements of the Stoic picture can be preserved in a more plausible fallibilist approach. Specifically, I propose to develop a Stoic fallibilist virtue epistemology that is based on the Stoic model of the moral virtues. This model of the intellectual virtues will show that (in keeping with a folk distinction) the wise person is never befooled, though that person might be fooled. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-14 DOI 10.1007/s12136-012-0158-0 Authors Sarah Wright, Department of Philosophy, University of Georgia, 107 Peabody Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA Journal Acta Analytica Online ISSN 1874-6349 Print ISSN 0353-5150|
|Keywords||Wisdom Stoics Sage Intellectual virtues Truth|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andree Hahmann (2011). The happy death of the Stoic. Wisdom and finitude in Stoic philosophy. Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):87-106.
William E. Stempsey (2004). A New Stoic: The Wise Patient. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (4):451 – 472.
Kevin McCain (2012). Against Hanna on Phenomenal Conservatism. Acta Analytica 27 (1):45-54.
Christoph Jedan (2009). Stoic Virtues: Chrysippus and the Theological Foundations of Stoic Ethics. Continuum.
Katja Maria Vogt (2008). Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. OUP USA.
Susanne Bobzien (1999). Logic: The Stoics (Part Two). In Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. CUP.
Brad Inwood & Lloyd P. Gerson (eds.) (2008). The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Hackett Pub. Co., Inc..
Sandrine Berges (2005). Loneliness and Belonging: Is Stoic Cosmopolitanism Still Defensible ? [REVIEW] Res Publica 11 (1):3-25.
Susanne Bobzien (1997). Stoic Conceptions of Freedom and Their Relation to Ethics. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 41 (S68):71-89.
C. Stephen Evans (2010). Wisdom as Conceptual Understanding. Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):369-381.
William O. Stephens, Stoic Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Constance Meinwald (2005). Ignorance and Opinion in Stoic Epistemology. Phronesis 50 (3):215 - 231.
Constance Meinwald (2005). Ignorance and Opinion in Stoic Epistemology. Phronesis 50 (3):215-231.
John Sellars (2012). Stoics Against Stoics In Cudworth's A Treatise of Freewill. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):935-952.
Added to index2012-03-30
Total downloads17 ( #78,107 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?