David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Oxford University Press 307-333 (2001)
This paper is a reply to George Boolos's three papers (Boolos (1987a, 1987b, 1990a)) concerned with the status of Hume's Principle. Five independent worries of Boolos concerning the status of Hume's Principle as an analytic truth are identified and discussed. Firstly, the ontogical concern about the commitments of Hume's Principle. Secondly, whether Hume's Principle is in fact consistent and whether the commitment to the universal number by adopting Hume's Principle might be problematic. Also the so-called `surplus content' worry is discussed, which points out that the conceptual resources to grasp Hume's Principle vastly outstrip the conceptual resources employed in arithmetical reasoning. And lastly whether Hume's Principle is in bad company with other unsuccessful implicit definitions. In the last section, an account towards our entitlement to Hume&'s Principle is sketched.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sean Walsh (2014). Logicism, Interpretability, and Knowledge of Arithmetic. Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):84-119.
Sean Walsh (2012). Comparing Peano Arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1679-1709.
Sean Walsh & Sean Ebels-Duggan (2015). Relative Categoricity and Abstraction Principles. Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):572-606.
Joshua Schechter & David Enoch (2006). Meaning and Justification: The Case of Modus Ponens. Noûs 40 (4):687 - 715.
Matti Eklund (2009). Bad Company and Neo-Fregean Philosophy. Synthese 170 (3):393 - 414.
Similar books and articles
Bird Alexander (1997). The Logic in Logicism. Dialogue 36:341�60.
Paul Hoffman (2011). Hume on the Distinction of Reason. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1131 - 1141.
John Beaudoin (1999). On Some Criticisms of Hume's Principle of Proportioning Cause to Effect. Philo 2 (2):26-40.
A. Merivale (2011). Mixed Feelings, Mixed Metaphors: Hume On Tragic Pleasure. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):259-269.
Philip A. Ebert (2008). A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):209-226.
Mark Wilson (1999). To Err is Humeant. Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):247-257.
Fraser Macbride (2000). On Finite Humet. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):150-159.
Jeffrey Ketland (2002). Hume = Small Hume. Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
Added to index2009-08-21
Total downloads96 ( #39,777 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #93,420 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?