Must Punishment Be Intended to Cause Suffering?

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):863-877 (2013)
It has recently been suggested that the fact that punishment involves an intention to cause suffering undermines expressive justifications of punishment. I argue that while punishment must involve harsh treatment, harsh treatment need not involve an intention to cause suffering. Expressivists should adopt this conception of harsh treatment
Keywords Punishment  Expressive theories of punishment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-012-9388-x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Nathan Hanna (2009). The Passions of Punishment. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):232-250.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bill Wringe (2015). Perp Walks as Punishment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):615-629.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

31 ( #102,719 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.