Cognition 115 (3):491-503 (2010)
|Abstract||Skepticism about the epistemic value of intuition in theoretical and philosophical inquiry has recently been bolstered by empirical research suggesting that people’s concrete-case intuitions are vulnerable to irrational biases (e.g., the order effect). What is more, skeptics argue that we have no way to ‘‘calibrate” our intuitions against these biases and no way of anticipating intuitional instability. This paper challenges the skeptical position, introducing data from two studies that suggest not only that people’s concrete-case intuitions are often stable, but also that people have introspective awareness of this stability, providing a promising means by which to assess the epistemic value of our intuitions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jennifer Wright (forthcoming). Tracking Instability in Our Philosophical Judgments: Is It Intuitive? Philosophical Psychology:1-17.
Stacey Swain, Joshua Alexander & Jonathan M. Weinberg (2008). The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):138-155.
Stacey Swain, Joshua Alexander & Jonathan Weinberg (2008). The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):138-155.
Matthew S. Bedke (2010). Intuitional Epistemology in Ethics. Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1069-1083.
Shaun Nichols & Joshua Knobe (2007). Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions. Noûs 41 (4):663–685.
Jennifer Nagel (2012). Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):495-527.
Jennifer Nagel (2012). Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases. In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford University Press.
Adam Feltz (2008). Problems with the Appeal to Intuition in Epistemology. Philosophical Explorations 11 (2):131 – 141.
Stephen Stich (forthcoming). Do Different Groups Have Different Epistemic Intuitions? A Reply to Jennifer Nagel1. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Sharmistha Dhar (2009). Determinism: Do Untutored Intuitions Feed the Bugbears? International Journal on Humanistic Ideology 2 (1):167-189.
Ragnar Francén (2010). No Deep Disagreement for New Relativists. Philosophical Studies 151:19--37.
Kevin Tobia, Wesley Buckwalter & Stephen Stich (2012). Moral Intuitions: Are Philosophers Experts? Philosophical Psychology:1-10.
S. Matthew Liao, Alex Weigmann, Joshua Alexander & Gerard Vong (2011). Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Loop Case. Philosophical Psychology 25 (5):661 - 671.
Added to index2012-07-24
Total downloads9 ( #114,124 of 549,106 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,390 of 549,106 )
How can I increase my downloads?