On the harmless impredicativity of N=('Hume's Principle')

In Matthias Schirn (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics Today: Papers From a Conference Held in Munich From June 28 to July 4,1993. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. pp. 339--68 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Hume's principle analytic?Crispin Wright - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):307-333.
Hume = small Hume.Jeffrey Ketland - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
A Dilemma for Neo-Fregeanism.Robert Trueman - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):361-379.
Predicative fragments of Frege arithmetic.Øystein Linnebo - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):153-174.
To err is humeant.Mark Wilson - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):247-257.
Dummett on Impredicativity.Alan Weir - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55 (1):65-101.
A Bayesian proof of a Humean principle.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):255-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
2 (#1,722,101)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism.Fraser MacBride - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):103-163.
New V, ZF and Abstraction.Stewart Shapiro & Alan Weir - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):293-321.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references