The significance of paradoxical language in Hua-Yen buddhism
Philosophy East and West 32 (3):325-338 (1982)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDirck Vorenkamp (1997). Hua-Yen Buddhism: Faith and Time in Fa-Tsang’s Thought. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Whalen Lai (1984). Process Metaphysics and Hua-Yen Buddhism. Idealistic Studies 14 (3):278-278.
Francis Cook (1977). Hua-Yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Robert Gimello (1976). Chih-Yeh and the Foundations of Hua-Yen Buddhism. Dissertation, Columbia University
Kang-Nam Oh (2000). The Taoist Influence on Hua-Yen Buddhism: A Case of the Sinicization of Buddhism in China. Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal 13.
Kwangsoo Park (2003). A Comparative Study of the Concept of Dharmakaya Buddha: Vairocana in Hua-Yen and Mahavairocana in Shingon Buddhism. International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture 2:305-331.
Jin Y. Park (2003). Living the Inconceivable: Hua-Yen Buddhism and Postmodern Différend. Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):165 – 174.
Dale Wright (1986). Language and Truth in Hua-Yen Buddhism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 13 (1):21-47.
Thomas Cleary (1983). Entry Into the Inconceivable: An Introduction to Hua-Yen Buddhism. University of Hawai'i Press.
Francis H. Cook (1972). The Meaning of Vairocana in Hua-Yen Buddhism. Philosophy East and West 22 (4):403-415.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #113,941 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
