David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):471-491 (1994)
A number of studies in the apparent motion literature were examined using the cognitive penetrability criterion to determine the extent to which beliefs affect the perception of apparent motion. It was found that the interaction between the perceptual processes mediating apparent motion and higher order processes appears to be limited. In addition, perceptual and inferential beliefs appear to have different effects on perceived motion optimality and direction. Our findings suggest that the system underlying apparent motion perception has more than one stage and is informationally encapsulated from cognitive factors
|Keywords||Belief Cognition Motion Perception Psychology Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Zenon W. Pylyshyn (1980). Computation and Cognition: Issues in the Foundation of Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):111-32.
Irvin Rock (1983). The Logic Of Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Nelson Goodman (1978). Ways of Worldmaking. Harvester Press.
Jerry A. Fodor (1985). Precis of the Modularity of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):1-42.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Ulric Tse & Patrick Cavanagh (2000). Chinese and Americans See Opposite Apparent Motions in a Chinese Character. Cognition 74 (3):B27-B32.
Similar books and articles
A. H. Wertheim (1999). Motion Percepts: “Sense Specific,” “Kinematic,” or . . . ? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):338-340.
Robert Schwartz (2001). Evolutionary Internalized Regularities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):626-628.
David H. Foster (2001). Natural Groups of Transformations Underlying Apparent Motion and Perceived Object Shape and Color. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):665-668.
K. Moutoussis, G. A. Keliris, Z. Kourtzi & N. K. Logothetis (2005). A Binocular Rivalry Study of Motion Perception in the Human Brain. Vision Research 45 (17):2231-43.
Michael Kubovy & William Epstein (2001). Internalization: A Metaphor We Can Live Without. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):618-625.
Robert Rynasiewicz (2000). On the Distinction Between Absolute and Relative Motion. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):70-93.
John David Rhodes & Elena Gorfinkel (eds.) (2011). Taking Place: Location and the Moving Image. University of Minnesota Press.
Tim van Gelder & Robert Port (eds.) (1995). Mind As Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. MIT Press.
Alan Cowey & Paul Azzopardi (2001). Is Blindsight Motion Blind? In Beatrice De Gelder, Edward H. F. De Haan & Charles A. Heywood (eds.), Out of Mind: Varieties of Unconscious Processes. Oxford University Press 87-103.
T. D. Frank, A. Daffertshofer & P. J. Beek (2001). Interpreting Screw Displacement Apparent Motion as a Self-Organizing Process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):668-669.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #304,368 of 1,934,532 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,381 of 1,934,532 )
How can I increase my downloads?