British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14 (2010)
|Abstract||In his influential paper, ‘General Criteria and Reasons in Aesthetics’, Frank Sibley outlines what is taken to be a generalist view (shared with Beardsley) such that there are general reasons for aesthetic judgement, and his account of the behaviour of such reasons, which differs from Beardsley's. In this paper my aim is to illuminate Sibley's position by employing a distinction that has arisen in meta-ethics in response to recent work by Jonathan Dancy in particular. Contemporary research involves two related yet distinct debates: (i) that between the particularist and the generalist on the status of moral principles; and (ii) that between holists and atomists on the nature of reasons. This division of labour has no correlate within the aesthetic particularism–generalism debate, and I will show how the ideas developed in relation to meta-ethics illuminate a difficulty with Sibley's view. I argue that we should understand Sibley as subscribing to both particularism and a version of holism about aesthetic reasons|
|Keywords||Sibley Particularism Holism Dancy Aesthetic concepts Aesthetic principles Default reasons|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Dancy (2004). Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.
Pekka Väyrynen (2006). Moral Generalism: Enjoy in Moderation. Ethics 116 (4):707-741.
George Dickie (2004). Reading Sibley. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):408-412.
Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar (2005). Irreversible Generalism: A Reply to Dickie. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):289-295.
Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar (2003). Aesthetic Principles. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):114-125.
Malcolm Budd (2006). The Characterization of Aesthetic Qualities by Essential Metaphors and Quasi-Metaphors. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):133-143.
Roger Crisp (2007). Ethics Without Reasons? Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):40-49.
Frank Sibley (2001). Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Vojko Strahovnik (2004). The Riddle of Aesthetic Principles. Acta Analytica 19 (33):189-208.
C. Kirwin (2011). Why Sibley Is (Probably) Not a Particularist After All. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):201-212.
Added to index2009-10-25
Total downloads40 ( #28,830 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,272 of 549,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?