Inquiry 22 (1-4):441-457 (1979)
|Abstract||Although prima facie no more than a successful private detective, Sherlock Holmes is a classic exponent of scientific method and has laid down several fundamental rules of scientific discovery and truth?detection. While he rediscovered and modified well?known principles of induction, analysis and synthesis, and decision theory, he also made significant contributions to patterns of explanation, and with his ?principle of exclusion? was an ingenious innovator. This latter cornerstone of Holmes's methodology led him to an interesting modal theory of the ?improbable possible? as a competitor to the famous doctrine of the ?impossible probable? put forward by Aristotle in de Arte Poetica. Holmes's scientific discipline was seasoned by warmth, understanding, and boldness|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rita C. Manning (1987). Why Sherlock Holmes Can't Be Replaced by an Expert System. Philosophical Studies 51 (January):19-28.
Wendy S. Parker (2008). Franklin, Holmes, and the Epistemology of Computer Simulation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):165 – 183.
Michael Allen Gillespie & John Samuel Harpham (2011). Sherlock Holmes, Crime, and the Anxieties of Globalization. Critical Review 23 (4):449-474.
Josef Steiff (ed.) (2011). Sherlock Holmes and Philosophy. Open Court Pub Co.
Thomas A. Sebeok (1980). "You Know My Method": A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. Gaslight Publications.
Eleonora Orlando (2008). Fictional Names Without Fictional Objects (Ficción Sin Metafísica). Crítica 40 (120):111 - 127.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads11 ( #99,611 of 549,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?