Illness Online: Self-reported Data and Questions of Trust in Medical and Social Research

Theory, Culture and Society 30 (4):131-150 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Self-reported data are regarded by medical researchers as invalid and less reliable than data produced by experts in clinical settings, yet individuals can increasingly contribute personal information to medical research through a variety of online platforms. In this article we examine this ‘participatory turn’ in healthcare research, which claims to challenge conventional delineations of what is valid and reliable for medical practice, by using aggregated self-reported experiences from patients and ‘pre-patients’ via the internet. We focus on 23andMe, a genetic testing company that collects genetic material and self-reported information about disease from its customers. Integral to this research method are relations of trust embedded in the information exchange: trust in customers’ data; trust between researchers/company and research subjects; trust in genetics; trust in the machine. We examine the performative dimension of these trust relations, drawing on Shapin and Schaffer’s discussion of how material, literary and social technologies are used in research in order to establish trust. Our scepticism of the company’s motives for building trust with the self-reporting consumer forces us to consider our own motives. How does the use of customer data for research purposes by 23andMe differ from the research practices of social scientists, especially those who also study digital traces? By interrogating the use of self-reported data in the genetic testing context, we examine our ethical responsibilities in studying the digital selves of others using internet methods. How researchers trust data, how participants trust researchers, and how technologies are trusted are all important considerations in studying the social life of digital data.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Case of Online Trust.Matteo Turilli, Mariarosaria Taddeo & Antonino Vaccaro - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3-4):333-345.
Regulation and the social licence for medical research.Mary Dixon-Woods & Richard E. Ashcroft - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):381-391.
Web 2.0 Social Networks: The Role of Trust.Sonja Grabner-Kräuter - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S4):505 - 522.
General and Familiar Trust in Websites.Coye Cheshire, Judd Antin, Karen S. Cook & Elizabeth Churchill - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):311-331.
Using informed consent to save trust.Nir Eyal - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):437-444.
The Nature of and Conditions for Online Trust.Daryl Koehn - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1/2):3 - 19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
21 (#630,965)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samantha Adams
University of Wales Lampeter

Citations of this work

How Inclusive Is European Philosophy of Science?Hans Radder - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):149-165.

Add more citations