On the incompatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom

Sophia 49 (3):333-41 (2010)
Abstract
I argue that the simple foreknowledge view, according to which God knows at some time t 1 what an agent S will do at t 2 , is incompatible with human free will. I criticize two arguments in favor of the thesis that the simple foreknowledge view is consistent with human freedom, and conclude that, even if divine foreknowledge does not causally compel human action, foreknowledge is nevertheless relevantly similar to other cases in which human freedom is undermined. These cases include those in which certain human actions are logically, rather than causally, foreclosed.
Keywords Divine foreknowledge  Free will  Frankfurt cases  Alternative possibilities
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,986
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John Martin Fischer (1982). Responsibility and Control. Journal of Philsophy 79 (January):24-40.
David Hunt (1999). ``On Augustine's Way&Quot. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):3-26.

View all 6 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-06-09

Total downloads

92 ( #12,848 of 1,100,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #27,650 of 1,100,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.