David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cognitive Science 36 (2):373-384 (2012)
Recent research suggests that individuals with relatively weak global precedence (i.e., a smaller propensity to view visual stimuli in a configural manner) show a reduced face inversion effect (FIE). Coupled with such findings, a number of recent studies have demonstrated links between an advantage for feature-based processing and the presentation of traits associated with autism among the general population. The present study sought to bridge these findings by investigating whether a relationship exists between the possession of autism-associated traits (i.e., as indicated by individuals’“autism quotient” [(AQ) and the size of the FIE. Participants completed an on-line study in which the AQ was measured prior to a standard face recognition task where half of the faces were inverted at test. The results confirmed that higher AQ levels were predictive of smaller FIEs. Implications for a common underlying factor relating to processing orientation are discussed
|Keywords||Autism‐spectrum quotient Configural versus feature‐based processing Face inversion effect|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Simon Baron-Cohen (2002). The Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (6):248-254.
M. BehrMann, C. Thomas & K. Humphreys (2006). Seeing It Differently: Visual Processing in Autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (6):258-264.
Uta Frith & Francesca Happé (1994). Autism: Beyond “Theory of Mind”. Cognition 50 (1-3):115-132.
Francesca Happé (1999). Autism: Cognitive Deficit or Cognitive Style? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (6):216-222.
Nira Liberman & Jens Förster (2009). The Effect of Psychological Distance on Perceptual Level of Construal. Cognitive Science 33 (7):1330-1341.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Davidson, Gaze-Fixation, Brain Activation, and Amygdala Volume in Unaffected Siblings of Individuals with Autism.
T. Montoute & G. Tiberghien (2001). Unconscious Familiarity and Local Context Effects on Low-Level Face Processing: A Reconstruction Hypothesis. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):503-523.
Yuri Miyamoto, Sakiko Yoshikawa & Shinobu Kitayama (2011). Feature and Configuration in Face Processing: Japanese Are More Configural Than Americans. Cognitive Science 35 (3):563-574.
T. N. Davies & D. D. Hoffman (2003). Facial Attention and Spacetime Fragments. Axiomathes 13 (3-4):303-327.
Bryan Paton, Jakob Hohwy & Peter Enticott (2011). The Rubber Hand Illusion Reveals Proprioceptive and Sensorimotor Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
Janet H. Hsiao & Sze Man Lam (2013). The Modulation of Visual and Task Characteristics of a Writing System on Hemispheric Lateralization in Visual Word Recognition—A Computational Exploration. Cognitive Science 37 (5):861-890.
Moreno I. Coco & Frank Keller (2012). Scan Patterns Predict Sentence Production in the Cross-Modal Processing of Visual Scenes. Cognitive Science 36 (7):1204-1223.
G. K. Humphrey & Melvyn A. Goodale (1998). Probing Unconscious Visual Processing with the Mccollough Effect. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):494-519.
Popko P. Molen (1979). The Ethology of Inter-Individual Differences. Acta Biotheoretica 28 (2).
K. Moutoussis, G. A. Keliris, Z. Kourtzi & N. K. Logothetis (2005). A Binocular Rivalry Study of Motion Perception in the Human Brain. Vision Research 45 (17):2231-43.
Colin G. Ellard (2001). Evolutionary and Intellectual Antecedents of Primate Visual Processing Streams. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):104-105.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (2001). Visual Perception is Not Visual Awareness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):985-985.
Added to index2012-01-24
Total downloads5 ( #178,779 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?