Unification and Convergence in Archaeological Explanation: The Agricultural “Wave-of-Advance” and the Origins of Indo-European Languages
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (S1):1-30 (1996)
Given the diversity of explanatory practices that is typical of the sciences a healthy pluralism would seem to be desirable where theories of explanation are concerned. Nevertheless, I argue that explanations are only unifying in Kitcher's unificationist sense if they are backed by the kind of understanding of underlying mechanisms, dispositions, constitutions, and dependencies that is central to a causalist account of explanation. This case can be made through analysis of Kitcher's account of the conditions under which apparent improvements in unifying power may be judged spurious. But to clarify what is at issue I consider an archaeological case in which debate about the merits of an ambitious explanatory account reproduces exactly the intuitions that divide Salmon and Kitcher. The case in question is the “demic-diffusion” account of contemporary linguistic diversity advanced by Renfrew in the late 1980s: the thesis that the diffusion of agricultural populations, itself attributed to demographic pressure, was responsible for the spread of the ancestral root languages (e.g., proto-Indo-Eurpoean) that account for the existence and distribution of linguistic macrofamilies. The credibility of this powerfully unifying argument pattern depends entirely on the plausibility of its claims about the conditions and mechanisms actually responsible for the explanandum, the spread of agriculture, and not on an elaboration of its unificationist virtues.
|Keywords||explanation unificationist account causalist account archaeological explanation linguistic macrofamilies neolithic revolution archaeological explanation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nancy Cartwright (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press.
Philip Kitcher (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford University Press.
Wesley Salmon (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press.
Philip Kitcher & Wesley Salmon (eds.) (1989). Scientific Explanation. Univ of Minnesota Pr.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alison Wylie (1995). Unification and Convergence in Archaeological Explanation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (Supplement):1-30.
Tere Vadén (2005). Probing for Indo-European Connections. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:301-304.
Erik Weber & Maarten Van Dyck (2002). Unification and Explanation. Synthese 131 (1):145 - 154.
Victor Gijsbers (2007). Why Unification is Neither Necessary nor Sufficient for Explanation. Philosophy of Science 74 (4):481-500.
Daniel Feinstein & Shuly Wintner (2008). Highly Constrained Unification Grammars. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (3):345-381.
T. A. Sinclair (1924). The Indo-European Languages of Eastern Turkestan. Classical Quarterly 18 (3-4):119-.
D. F. Easton (1991). Indo-European Takeovers Robert Drews: The Coming of the Greeks: Indo-European Conquests in the Aegean and the Near East. Pp. Xviii + 257; 8 Figs. Princeton University Press, 1988. $29.95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):132-133.
Michael Strevens (2004). The Causal and Unification Approaches to Explanation Unified—Causally. Noûs 38 (1):154–176.
R. McKenzie (1931). Notes on Indo-European Etymologies. Preliminary to a Full Discussion of Indo-European Roots and Their Formation. By T. G. Tucker, C.M.G., Litt.D., Emeritus Professor of Classical Philology in the University of Melbourne. Pp. 38. Halle A. S.: Max Niemeyer Verlag, N.D. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (05):204-.
Carl Darling Buck (1904). 'Indo-European' or 'Indo-Germanic'? The Classical Review 18 (08):399-401.
Todd Jones (1995). Reductionism and the Unification Theory of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 62 (1):21-30.
Todd Jones (1998). Unification, Deduction, and History: A Reply to Steel. Philosophy of Science 65 (4):672-681.
A. J. Beattie (1960). The Indo-European Languages Walter Porzig: Die Gliederung des Indogermanischen Sprachgebiets. Pp. 251. Heidelberg: Winter, 1954. Paper, DM. 35. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 10 (03):243-245.
D. M. Jones (1967). Accent and Syncope Oswald Szemerényi: Syncope in Greek and Indo-European and the Nature of Indo-European Accent. (Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli, Quaderni Della Sezione Linguistica, Iii.) Pp. Xviii+430. Naples: Istituto Orientale, 1964. Paper, L. 7,500. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 17 (02):169-171.
Added to index2010-09-15
Total downloads113 ( #33,615 of 1,902,101 )
Recent downloads (6 months)95 ( #4,842 of 1,902,101 )
How can I increase my downloads?