David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):389-402 (2002)
Archaeology can provide two bodies of information relevant to the understanding of the evolution of human cognition – the timing of developments, and the evolutionary context of these developments. The challenge is methodological. Archaeology must document attributes that have direct implications for underlying cognitive mechanisms. One example of such a cognitive archaeology is found in spatial cognition. The archaeological record documents an evolutionary sequence that begins with ape-equivalent spatial abilities 2.5 million years ago and ends with the appearance of modern abilities in the still remote past of 400,000 years ago. The timing of these developments reveals two major episodes in the evolution in spatial ability, one, 1.5 million years ago and the other, one million years later. The two episodes of development in spatial cognition had very different evolutionary contexts. The first was associated with the shift to an open country adaptive niche that occurred early in the time range of Homo erectus. The second was associated with no clear adaptive shift, though it does appear to have coincided with the invasion of more hostile environments and the appearance of systematic hunting of large mammals. Neither, however, occurred in a context of modern hunting and gathering. Key Words: Archaeology; evolution; Homo erectus; spatial cognition; symmetry.
|Keywords||Archaeology evolution Homo erectus spatial cognition symmetry|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Börje Ekstig (2012). Superexponentially Accelerating Evolution. World Futures 68 (1):40 - 48.
Herman T. Epstein (2002). Evolution of the Reasoning Hominid Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):408-409.
Sue Taylor Parker (2002). Locating Early Homo and Homo Erectus Tool Production Along the Extractive Foraging/Cognitive Continuum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):414-415.
Stuart R. Hameroff (1998). Did Consciousness Cause the Cambrian Evolutionary Explosion? In Stuart R. Hameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & A. C. Scott (eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness II. MIT Press. 2--421.
P. Thomas Schoenemann (2002). Putting Meat on the Bones: The Necessity of Empirical Tests of Hypotheses About Cognitive Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):416-417.
Valerie E. Stone (2002). Footloose and Fossil-Free No More: Evolutionary Psychology Needs Archaeology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):420-421.
Matthew Johnson (1999). Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishers.
Ben Jeffares (2002). The Explanatory Limits of Cognitive Archaeology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):410-412.
Thomas Wynn (2002). The Devil in the Details. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):426-432.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #57,553 of 1,011,263 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,700 of 1,011,263 )
How can I increase my downloads?