David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 1 (1):9-31 (1986)
To avoid the difficulties that follow from essentialism in ethics, a new account of generality is required. The first half of this paper develops such an account by considering the work of Levinas and of Merleau-Ponty who turn to the incarnate subject as expressing a mode of generality of which universals and essences are derivative types. I call this kind of generality “carnal generality” and the context-specific complexes that exhibit it “carnal generals.” In the second part I turn to paradigmatic lives both within and outside of religious tradition to show how such lives function as carnal generals. I examine some competing claims, Nelson Goodman’s account of samples and Alasdair MacIntyre’s view of the virtues as they bear on resolving ethical disputes, and suggest reasons for preferring a phenomenological view of paradigmatic lives
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Klemens Kappel (2006). A Diagnosis and Resolution to the Generality Problem. Philosophical Studies 127 (3):525 - 560.
Earl Conee (2013). The Specificity of the Generality Problem. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):751-762.
Robert Lane (2004). On Peirce’s Early Realism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (4):575 - 605.
Patrick Dieveney (2013). Anything and Everything. Erkenntnis 78 (1):119 - 140.
Christopher Belshaw (2003). More Lives, Better Lives. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):127-141.
Christopher Lepock (2009). How to Make the Generality Problem Work for You. Acta Analytica 24 (4):275-286.
Arnold Berleant (1982). Multinationals, Local Practice, and the Problem of Ethical Consistency. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (3):185 - 193.
Keith DeRose (2002). Assertion, Knowledge, and Context. Philosophical Review 111 (2):167-203.
Nathan Andersen (2010). Exemplars in Environmental Ethics: Taking Seriously the Lives of Thoreau, Leopold, Dillard and Abbey. Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):43 – 55.
Krzysztof Guczalski (2005). Expressive Meaning in Music: Generality Versus Particularity. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (4):342-367.
Michael Levin (2002). Is the Generality Problem Too General? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):87 - 97.
Laureano Luna (2008). Can We Consistently Say That We Cannot Speak About Everything? The Reasoner 2 (9):5-7.
Jonathan Adler & Michael Levin (2002). Is the Generality Problem Too General? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):87-97.
Gonçalo Santos (2010). A Not So Fine Version of Generality Relativism. Theoria 25 (2):149-161.
Michael S. Pritchard (1998). Professional Responsibility: Focusing on the Exemplary. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):215-233.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads8 ( #405,450 of 1,911,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #178,657 of 1,911,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?