Ideal interpretation: The theories of Zhu XI and Ronald Dworkin
Philosophy East and West 60 (1):pp. 88-114 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlexander Brown (2007). An Egalitarian Plateau? Challenging the Importance of Ronald Dworkin's Abstract Egalitarian Rights. Res Publica 13 (3).
Rolans Pierik & Robeyns Ingrid (2007). Resources Versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory. Political Studies 55 (1):133.
Ronald Dworkin & Justine Burley (eds.) (2004). Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies by Dworkin. Blackwell Pub..
Colin M. Macleod (1997). Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance? Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529 - 559.
Roland Pierik (2006). Reparations for Luck Egalitarians. Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):423–440.
M. C. (1997). Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance? Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529-559.
F. M. Kamm (2004). Ronald Dworkin's Views on Abortion and Assisted Suicide. In Ronald Dworkin & Justine Burley (eds.), Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies by Dworkin. Blackwell Pub..
Douglas N. Husak (1979). Ronald Dworkin and the Right to Liberty:Taking Rights Seriously Ronald Dworkin. Ethics 90 (1):121-.
Rebecca L. Brown (2006). How Constitutional Theory Found its Soul : The Contributions of Ronald Dworkin. In Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press.
A. P. Martinich & Yang Xiao (2009). Ideal Interpretation: The Theories of Zhu Xi and Ronald Dworkin. Philosophy East and West 60 (1):88-114.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-01-23Total downloads4 ( #178,434 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
