David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):38-51 (2009)
Mou Zongsan incorrectly uses Kant’s practical reason to interpret Confucianism. The saying that “what is it that we have in common in our minds? It is the li 理 (principles) and the yi 义 (righteousness)” reveals how Mencius explains the origin of li and yi through a theory of common sense. In “the li and the yi please our minds, just as the flesh of beef and mutton and pork please our mouths,” “please” is used twice, proving aesthetic judgment is necessary to understanding Mencius. An analysis of Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming’s ideas will show that Confucianism should be interpreted by appealing to aesthetic judgment, and a discussion of Kant’s theory of judgment and Gadamer’s critique of Kant’s theory will support the same point. The conclusion is that Chinese moral philosophy should be interpreted through aesthetic judgment.
|Keywords||Mencius Confucianism practical reason aesthetic judgment 孟子 儒学 实践理性 直感判断力|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Howard Caygill (1995). A Kant Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell.
Immanuel Kant (1790/2005). Critique of Judgment. Barnes & Noble Books.
Immanuel Kant (1909/2004). Critique of Practical Reason. Dover Publications.
Yangming Wang (1963). Instructions for Practical Living, and Other Neo-Confucian Writing. New York, Columbia University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Adrian M. S. Piper (2009). Intuition and Concrete Particularity in Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic. In Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O'Connor (eds.), Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices From Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Stanford University Press.
Albert Hofstadter (1975). Kant's Aesthetic Revolution. Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.
Christian Helmut Wenzel (2009). Kant's Aesthetics: Overview and Recent Literature. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):380-406.
Rebecca Kukla (ed.) (2006). Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
C. E. Emmer (2001). The Senses of the Sublime: Possibilities for a Non-Ocular Sublime in Kant's Critique of Judgment. In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter.
Immanuel Kant (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Rodolphe Gasché (2003). The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant's Aesthetics. Stanford University Press.
Jennifer McMahon (2011). Critical Aesthetic Realism. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (2):49-69.
Xie Xialing & Gao Limin (2009). Aesthetic Judgment: The Power of the Mind in Understanding Confucianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):38 - 51.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #97,113 of 1,099,960 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #51,435 of 1,099,960 )
How can I increase my downloads?