Doing and refraining from refraining

Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (6):621 - 632 (1994)
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to prove that in every stit semantic structure that contains a busy choice sequence, neither does doing imply refraining from refraining from doing, nor does refraining from refraining from doing imply doing
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01052780
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 20,898
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ming Xu (2012). Actions as Events. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (4):765 - 809.
Ming Xu (1998). Axioms for Deliberative Stit. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (5):505-552.
Stefan Wölfl (2002). Propositional Q-Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (5):387-414.
Ming Xu (1995). On the Basic Logic of STIT with a Single Agent. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):459-483.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

24 ( #160,520 of 1,907,403 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #274,312 of 1,907,403 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.