Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):98–122 (2000)
|Abstract||Kripke, argued like this: it seems possible that E; the appearance can't be explained away as really pertaining to a "presentation" of E; so, pending a different explanation, it is possible that E. Textbook Kripkeans see in the contrast between E and its presentation intimations of a quite general distinction between two sorts of meaning. E's secondary or a posteriori meaning is the set of all worlds w which E, as employed here, truly describes. Its primary or a priori meaning is the set of all w such that if w is actual, then E is true. "Conceivability error" occurs when a primary possibility is mistaken for a secondary one. Textbook Kripkeanism is rejected on the grounds that it makes meaning too modal and modality too much a matter of meaning.|
|Keywords||A Priori, Concept, Consciousness, Meaning, Metaphysics, Modality, Semantics|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tadeusz Szubka (2000). Meaning Rationalism, a Priori, and Transparency of Content. Philosophical Psychology 13 (4):491-503.
Michael McKinsey (1987). Apriorism in the Philosophy of Language. Philosophical Studies 52 (July):1-32.
Casimir Lewy (1976). Meaning and Modality. Cambridge University Press.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). A New Definition of A Priori Knowledge: In Search of a Modal Basis. Metaphysica 9 (2):57-68.
David J. Chalmers (2006). The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics. In Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Josep Macia (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Yablo (2009). Thoughts: Papers on Mind, Meaning, and Modality. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads178 ( #1,698 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #1,928 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?