Graduate studies at Western
Religious Studies 45 (1):85-93 (2009)
|Abstract||William Vallicella poses a dilemma for continuous-creation accounts of conservation, which he attempts to solve by conjoining presentism and four-dimensionalism. I claim that presentist four-dimensionalism fails to appreciate the real problem behind continuous creation and persistence, which is a presumption of the discontinuity of time. I will argue that if we assume that time is discontinuous, then, (1) presentist four-dimensionalism cannot alone account for persistence, and (2) created entities are also not in clear need of conservation in Vallicella’s solution. Lastly, I conclude by suggesting that the worry over persistence for continuous creation is a problem only if persistence requires causal continuity.|
|Keywords||Vallicella presentism four-dimensionalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ernâni Magalhães (2011). Presentism, Persistence and Composition. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):509-523.
Jiri Benovsky (2009). Presentism and Persistence. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):291-309.
Ryan Wasserman, Recombination, Causal Constraints and Humean Supervenience: An Argument for Temporal Parts?
Yuri Balashov (2000). Persistence and Space-Time. The Monist 83 (3):321-340.
Theodore Sider (1997). Four-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
G. Nerlich (2003). Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):288 – 290.
Theodore Sider (2001). Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford University Press.
William F. Vallicella (2002). The Creation–Conservation Dilemma and Presentist Four-Dimensionalism. Religious Studies 38 (2):187-200.
Added to index2009-02-11
Total downloads70 ( #15,078 of 739,347 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,347 )
How can I increase my downloads?