Graduate studies at Western
Informal Logic 13 (3) (1991)
|Abstract||How are dependent (or linked) premises to be distinguished from independent (or convergent) premises? Deductive validity, sometimes proposed as a necessary condition for depende'nce, cannot be, for the premises of both inductive and deductive but invalid arguments can be dependent. The question is really this: When do multiple premises for a certain conclusion fonn one argument for that conclusion and when do they form multiple arguments? Answer: Premises are dependent when the evidence they offer for their conclusion is more than the ordinary sum of their probabilities. Ordinary sums are defined in the paper|
|Keywords||linked premises, convergent premises, induction, deduction|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Similar books and articles
Marco Panza (2012). The Twofold Role of Diagrams in Euclid's Plane Geometry. Synthese 186 (1):55-102.
Neil Sinclair (2012). Promotionalism, Motivationalism and Reasons to Perform Physically Impossible Actions. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):647-659.
Joshua Gert (2002). Korsgaard's Private-Reasons Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):303-324.
Alan H. Goldman (2005). Reason Internalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):505 - 533.
Herman E. Stark (2004). Reasons Without Principles. Inquiry 47 (2):143 – 167.
Added to index2009-02-26
Total downloads9 ( #122,430 of 724,391 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?