David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):595-606 (2008)
The view of language is greatly changed from early modern philosophy to later modern philosophy and to postmodern philosophy. The linguistic question in early modern philosophy, which is characterized by rationalism and empiricism, is discussed in this paper. Linguistic phenomena are not at the center of philosophical reflections in early modern philosophy. The subject of consciousness is at the center of the philosophy, which makes language serve purely as an instrument for representing thoughts. Locke, Leibniz and Descartes consider language from a representationalist point of view. To them, language itself is idealized and represents thought as if it were thought representing itself. Like the structural linguist Saussure, the founders of phenomenology and analytical philosophy give much attention to the logical or static structure of language, and stick up for the representationalism of early modern philosophy. However, their successors refuse to accept this attitude, meaning the final collapse of representationalism.
|Keywords||language idea representationalism early modern philosophy 语言 观念 表象论 早期现代哲学|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1922/1999). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Dover Publications.
Michel Foucault (1970). The Order of Things. Tavistock.
John R. Searle (2004). Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (2007). New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophical Review. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 293-297.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.) (2010). Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume V. OUP Oxford.
Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.) (2008). Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume Iv. OUP Oxford.
Jon Miller & Brad Inwood (eds.) (2003). Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Nancey Murphy (1990). Scientific Realism and Postmodern Philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (3):291-303.
Daniel Garber & Steven M. Nadler (eds.) (2006). Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Donald Rutherford (ed.) (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Losonsky (2006). Linguistic Turns in Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Hannah Dawson (2007). Locke, Language, and Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Yang Dachun & Cui Zengbao (2008). Representationalism and the Linguistic Question in Early Modern Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):595 - 606.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #112,522 of 1,789,825 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #262,654 of 1,789,825 )
How can I increase my downloads?