Some Mahāsāṃghika Arguments for the Cognition of Nonexistent Objects

The present paper explores some pre-Vibhāṣika sources including the Kathāvatthu, *Śāriputrābhidharma, and Vijñānakāya. These sources suggest an early origin of the concept of the cognition of nonexistent objects (asad-ālambana-jñāna) among the Mahāsāṃghikas and some of its sub-schools. These scattered sources also indicate some different aspects of this theory from that held by the Dārṣṭāntikas and the Sautrāntikas. In particular, some Mahāsāṃghika arguments for the cognition of nonexistent objects reveal how a soteriologically-oriented issue gradually develops into a sophisticated philosophical concept.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Zhihua Yao, Some Mahāsāṃghika Arguments for the Cognition of Nonexistent Objects
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Terence Parsons (1982). Are There Nonexistent Objects? American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (4):365 - 371.
W. D. (1981). Nonexistent Objects. Review of Metaphysics 35 (1):151-153.
Maria Reicher, Nonexistent Objects. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

173 ( #8,755 of 1,725,607 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #41,310 of 1,725,607 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.