Some Mahāsāṃghika Arguments for the Cognition of Nonexistent Objects

Abstract The present paper explores some pre-Vibhāṣika sources including the Kathāvatthu, *Śāriputrābhidharma, and Vijñānakāya. These sources suggest an early origin of the concept of the cognition of nonexistent objects (asad-ālambana-jñāna) among the Mahāsāṃghikas and some of its sub-schools. These scattered sources also indicate some different aspects of this theory from that held by the Dārṣṭāntikas and the Sautrāntikas. In particular, some Mahāsāṃghika arguments for the cognition of nonexistent objects reveal how a soteriologically-oriented issue gradually develops into a sophisticated philosophical concept.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Configure

Similar books and articles
Zhihua Yao (2007). Dharmakīrti and Husserl on Negative Judgments. In Chan-Fai Cheung & Chung-Chi Yu (eds.), Phenomenology 2005, Vol. I, Selected Essays from Asia,. Zeta Books.
William J. Rapaport (1991). Meinong, Alexius; I: Meinongian Semantics. In Hans Burkhardt & Barry Smith (eds.), Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology. Philosophia Verlag.
Terence Parsons (1982). Are There Nonexistent Objects? American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (4):365 - 371.
W. D. (1981). Nonexistent Objects. The Review of Metaphysics 35 (1):151-153.
Maria Reicher, Nonexistent Objects. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-04-23

Total downloads

27 ( #45,781 of 549,087 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

22 ( #2,436 of 549,087 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums