Typology of Nothing: Heidegger, Daoism and Buddhism

Comparative Philosophy 1 (1):78-89 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Parmenides expelled nonbeing from the realm of knowledge and forbade us to think or talk about it. But still there has been a long tradition of nay-sayings throughout the history of Western and Eastern philosophy. Are those philosophers talking about the same nonbeing or nothing? If not, how do their concepts of nothing differ from each other? Could there be different types of nothing? Surveying the traditional classifications of nothing or nonbeing in the East and West have led me to develop a typology of nothing that consists of three main types: 1) privative nothing, commonly known as absence; 2) negative nothing, the altogether not or absolute nothing; and finally 3) original nothing, the nothing that is equivalent to being. I will test my threefold typology of nothing by comparing the similarities and differences between the conceptions of nothing in Heidegger, Daoism and Buddhism. With this study, I hope that I will clarify some confusion in the understanding of nothing in Heidegger, Daoism and Buddhism, and shed light on the central philosophical issue of “what there is not”.

Similar books and articles

Four-dimensional time in dzogchen and Heidegger.Zhihua Yao - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (4):512-532.
The meaning of detachment in Daoism, Buddhism, and Stoicism.David B. Wong - 2006 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5 (2):207-219.
Wang bi.Ronnie Littlejohn - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The limit of language in daoism.Koji Tanaka - 2004 - Asian Philosophy 14 (2):191 – 205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-23

Downloads
8,143 (#480)

6 months
347 (#4,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Zhihua Yao
Chinese University of Hong Kong

References found in this work

Kritik der reinen Vernunft.Immanuel Kant - 2020 - Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Sein und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1928 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 7:161-161.
Sein und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1981 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 14 (1):57-58.
Sein und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1929 - Mind 38 (151):355-370.
Was ist metaphysik?Martin Heidegger - 1943 - Frankfurt am Main,: V. Klostermann.

View all 11 references / Add more references