David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 13 (2):373-390 (2004)
Saccadic chronostasis refers to the subjective temporal lengthening of the first visual stimulus perceived after an eye movement. It has been quantified using a duration discrimination task. Most models of human duration discrimination hypothesise an internal clock. These models could explain chronostasis as a transient increase in internal clock speed due to arousal following a saccade, leading to temporal overestimation. Two experiments are described which addressed this hypothesis by parametrically varying the duration of the stimuli that are being judged. Changes in internal clock speed predict chronostasis effects proportional to stimulus duration. No evidence for proportionality was found. Two further experiments assessed the appropriateness of the control conditions employed. Results indicated that the chronostasis effect is constant across a wide range of stimulus durations and does not reflect the pattern of visual stimulation experienced during a saccade, suggesting that arousal is not critical. Instead, alternative processes, such as one affecting the onset of timing are implicated. Further research is required to select between these alternatives
|Keywords||*Eye Movements *Time Estimation *Visual Stimulation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Susan Pockett (2002). On Subjective Back-Referral and How Long It Takes to Become Conscious of a Stimulus: A Reinterpretation of Libet's Data. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (2):141-61.
Benjamin W. Libet, Feinstein E. W. & Pearl B. (1979). Subjective Referral of the Timing for a Cognitive Sensory Experience. Brain 102:193-224.
Matthew S. Matell & Warren H. Meck (2000). Neuropsychological Mechanisms of Interval Timing Behavior. Bioessays 22 (1):94-103.
John Gibbon & Russell M. Church (1990). Representation of Time. Cognition 37 (1-2):23-54.
Citations of this work BETA
Tomomitsu Herai & Ken Mogi (2014). Perception of Temporal Duration Affected by Automatic and Controlled Movements. Consciousness and Cognition 29:23-35.
Similar books and articles
Gilles Pourtois, Michael De Pretto, Claude-Alain Hauert & Patrik Vuilleumier (2006). Time Course of Brain Activity During Change Blindness and Change Awareness: Performance is Predicted by Neural Events Before Change Onset. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (12):2108-2129.
Marie-Hélène Grosbras & Tomáš Paus (2003). Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field Facilitates Visual Awareness. European Journal of Neuroscience 18 (11):3121-3126.
Susan Pockett (2006). The Great Subjective Back-Referral Debate: Do Neural Responses Increase During a Train of Stimuli? Consciousness and Cognition 15 (3):551-559.
Daniel A. Pollen (2006). Brain Stimulation and Conscious Experience: Electrical Stimulation of the Cortical Surface at a Threshold Current Evokes Sustained Neuronal Activity Only After a Prolonged Latency. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (3):560-565.
Daniel A. Pollen (2004). Brain Stimulation and Conscious Experience. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (3):626-645.
Anuenue Kukona & Whitney Tabor (2011). Impulse Processing: A Dynamical Systems Model of Incremental Eye Movements in the Visual World Paradigm. Cognitive Science 35 (6):1009-1051.
Patrick Haggard, Sam Clark & Jeri Kalogeras (2002). Voluntary Action and Conscious Awareness. Nature Neuroscience 5 (4):382-385.
Joseph Glicksohn (2001). Temporal Cognition and the Phenomenology of Time: A Multiplicative Function for Apparent Duration. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):1-25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #135,149 of 1,796,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #208,919 of 1,796,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?