David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2):1-27 (2000)
The question of judgment has become one of the central problems in recent social, political and ethical thought. This paper explores Hannah Arendt's decisive contribution to this debate by attempting to reconstruct analytically two distinctive perspectives on judgment from the corpus of her writings. By exploring her relation to Aristotelian and Kantian sources, and by uncovering debts and parallels to key thinkers such as Benjamin and Heidegger, it is argued that Arendt's work pinpoints the key antinomy within political judgment itself, that between the viewpoints of the political actor and the political spectator. The paper concludes by highlighting some lacunae and difficulties in the development of Arendt's account, difficulties that set challenges for those theorists (such as Seyla Benhabib and Alessandro Ferrara) who wish to appropriate and extend Arendt's contribution into the field of contemporary critical theory. Key Words: action aesthetics community freedom history judgment reflection.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marieke Borren (2013). 'A Sense of the World': Hannah Arendt's Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Common Sense. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (2):225 - 255.
Majid Yar (2000). Arendt's Heideggerianism: Contours of a ‘Postmetaphysical’ Political Theory? Cultural Values 4 (1):18-39.
Similar books and articles
Dana Richard Villa (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
Avery Goldman (2010). An Antinomy of Political Judgment: Kant, Arendt, and the Role of Purposiveness in Reflective Judgment. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):331-352.
A. Degryse (2011). Sensus Communis as a Foundation for Men as Political Beings: Arendt's Reading of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):345-358.
Alice MacLachlan, An Ethic of Plurality: Reconciling Politics and Morality in Hannah Arendt. History and Judgment: IWM JVF Conference Vol. 21.
Joke J. Hermsen (1999). Who" is the Spectator? Hannah Arendt and Simone Weil on Thinking and Judging. In Joke J. Hermsen & Dana Richard Villa (eds.), The Judge and the Spectator: Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy. Peeters
Roger Berkowitz (ed.) (2010). Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. Fordham University Press.
Ronald Beiner (1997). Rereading Hannah Arendt's Kant Lectures. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):21-32.
Peg Birmingham (1999). Hannah Arendt : The Spectator's Vision. In Joke J. Hermsen & Dana Richard Villa (eds.), The Judge and the Spectator: Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy. Peeters
Linda M. G. Zerilli (2005). "We Feel Our Freedom": Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory 33 (2):158 - 188.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #100,951 of 1,780,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #95,912 of 1,780,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?