David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (1):1-33 (1995)
The article presents examples of economists pressing methodologies on students and professional colleagues without actually articulating, and thus exposing to critical examination, the methodological precepts being urged. Such behavior has twisted economic research and doctrine. Topics discussed (with various degrees of approval and disapproval) include the ?Cartesian? appeal to first principles, justificationism, supposed rigor, modeling, the decorative use of symbols, the parade of technique, abuses of econometrics, nonquantitative evidence, competition among hypotheses, fallacy-mongering, fads and frontiersmanship, academic incentives and games, the supposed analogy between markets for academic research and for ordinary goods, and clarity versus obscurantism. The article calls for exposing and examining tacit preachments. It calls on economists to support each other in resisting inappropriate pressures.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Claude Gratton (2000). Counterexamples and Tacit Premises. Inquiry 20 (1):9-22.
Jonathan Perraton & Iona Tarrant (2007). What Does Tacit Knowledge Actually Explain? Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3):353-370.
Andrea Pozzali (2007). Tacit Knowledge, Implicit Learning and Scientific Reasoning. Mind and Society 7 (2):227-237.
Stephen G. Henry (2011). A Clinical Perspective on Tacit Knowledge and Its Varieties. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):13-17.
Stephen Turner (2012). Making the Tacit Explicit. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):385-402.
Charles Lowney (2011). Ineffable, Tacit, Explicable and Explicit. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):18-37.
Harry Collins (2011). Analysing Tacit Knowledge. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):38-42.
Jon Cogburn (2004). Inferentialism and Tacit Knowledge. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):503 - 524.
Dale Cannon (2002). Construing Polanyi's Tacit Knowing as Knowing by Acquaintance Rather Than Knowing by Representation. Tradition and Discovery 29 (2):26-43.
David A. Stone (2013). The Experience of the Tacit in Multi- and Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):289-308.
Maciej Witek (2012). Tacit Mechanisms and Heuristic Theorizing: Comments on Ryszard Wójcicki's “Is There Only One Truth? An Introduction to the Pragmatic Theory of Knowledge Acquisition”. Filozofia Nauki 1.
Auli Toom (2012). Considering the Artistry and Epistemology of Tacit Knowledge and Knowing. Educational Theory 62 (6):621-640.
Walter B. Gulick (2006). Signals, Schemas, Subsidiaries, and Skills. Tradition and Discovery 33 (3):44-62.
Hillel D. Braude (2009). Clinical Intuition Versus Statistics: Different Modes of Tacit Knowledge in Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (3):181-198.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads1 ( #438,687 of 1,101,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,452 of 1,101,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?