David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):271 - 288 (2000)
Ethical sensitivity triggers the entire ethical decision-making process (i.e., recognition of ethical content in work situations). In this article, five factors are examined that affect tax practitioners' professional ethical sensitivity. The five factors that were examined include role conflict, role ambiguity, job satisfaction, professional commitment, and ethical orientation. Ethical content in work situations is examined in relation to professional ethics as enumerated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant's (AICPA) Statements on Responsibilities in Tax Practice (SRTP). Utilizing Hunt and Vitell's (1986, 1993) General Theory of Ethics, a model of ethical sensitivity was constructed and empirically tested. Role conflict negatively and job satisfaction positively influenced tax practitioners' ethical sensitivity. Also, the covariates of the tax practitioner's professional risk level and type of employer were found to be significant. The significant factors are job specific. The tax firm may have the best opportunity to positively change a tax practitioner's ethical recognition abilities. Professional accounting organizations may need to evaluate if resources should be used to formulate, maintain, and publicize codes of conduct because of the lack of significance of professional commitment.
|Keywords||code of conduct ethical sensitivity Hunt and Vitell's general theory of ethics tax practitioners|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
W. McGee Robert, S. M. Ho Simon & Y. S. Li Annie (2008). A Comparative Study on Perceived Ethics of Tax Evasion: Hong Kong Vs the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2).
Cheryl A. Cruz, William E. Shafer & Jerry R. Strawser (2000). A Multidimensional Analysis of Tax Practitioners' Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 24 (3):223 - 244.
Rex L. Marshall, Robert W. Armstrong & Malcolm Smith (1998). The Ethical Environment of Tax Practitioners: Western Australian Evidence. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1265-1279.
Elaine M. Doyle, Jane Frecknall Hughes & Keith W. Glaister (2009). Linking Ethics and Risk Management in Taxation: Evidence From an Exploratory Study in Ireland and the Uk. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):177 - 198.
Evelyn C. Hume, Ernest R. Larkins & Govind Iyer (1999). On Compliance with Ethical Standards in Tax Return Preparation. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):229 - 238.
Katie R. Place (2011). A Qualitative Examination of Public Relations Practitioner Ethical Decision Making and the Deontological Theory of Ethical Issues Management. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (3):226-245.
Yuka Sakurai & Valerie Braithwaite (2003). Taxpayers' Perceptions of Practitioners: Finding One Who Is Effective and Does the Right Thing? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):375 - 387.
Juan Carlos Molero & Francesc Pujol (2012). Walking Inside the Potential Tax Evader's Mind: Tax Morale Does Matter. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):151-162.
Robert W. McGee, Simon S. M. Ho & Annie Y. S. Li (2008). A Comparative Study on Perceived Ethics of Tax Evasion: Hong Kong Vs the United States. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):147 - 158.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #147,128 of 1,004,688 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,688 )
How can I increase my downloads?