- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Object labeling influences infant phonetic learning and generalization
Cognition 132 (2):151-163 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Role of stimulus labeling in stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas & Alberta Decapito - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (6):913.
Mediated generalization via stimulus labeling: A replication and extension.David R. Thomas, Alberta D. Caronite, Gary L. LaMonica & Kenneth L. Hoving - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p1):531.
Intra-list generalization as a factor in verbal learning.E. J. Gibson - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (3):185.
Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese.Janet F. Werker, Ferran Pons, Christiane Dietrich, Sachiyo Kajikawa, Laurel Fais & Shigeaki Amano - 2007 - Cognition 103 (1):147-162.
Word-level information influences phonetic learning in adults and infants.Naomi H. Feldman, Emily B. Myers, Katherine S. White, Thomas L. Griffiths & James L. Morgan - 2013 - Cognition 127 (3):427-438.
Stimulus categorizing in the generalization of a voluntary response.Eric Aronson & Albert Erlebacher - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):585.
Learning General Phonological Rules From Distributional Information: A Computational Model.Shira Calamaro & Gaja Jarosz - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (3):647-666.
Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.Jessica Maye, Janet F. Werker & LouAnn Gerken - 2002 - Cognition 82 (3):B101-B111.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-05-21
Downloads
22 (#690,757)
6 months
10 (#251,846)
2014-05-21
Downloads
22 (#690,757)
6 months
10 (#251,846)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Discriminating Non-native Vowels on the Basis of Multimodal, Auditory or Visual Information: Effects on Infants’ Looking Patterns and Discrimination.Sophie Ter Schure, Caroline Junge & Paul Boersma - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Learning a Phonological Contrast Modulates the Auditory Grouping of Rhythm.H. Henny Yeung, Anjali Bhatara & Thierry Nazzi - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (6):2000-2020.
References found in this work
Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.Jessica Maye, Janet F. Werker & LouAnn Gerken - 2002 - Cognition 82 (3):B101-B111.
Phonetic details in perception and production allow various patterns in phonological change.Jessica Maye, Janet F. Werker & LouAnn Gerken - 2002 - Cognition 82 (3):B101-B111.
Cue integration with categories: Weighting acoustic cues in speech using unsupervised learning and distributional statistics.Joseph C. Toscano & Bob McMurray - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (3):434.
Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience.Kyle E. Chambers, Kristine H. Onishi & Cynthia Fisher - 2003 - Cognition 87 (2):B69-B77.
Visual speech contributes to phonetic learning in 6-month-old infants.Tuomas Teinonen, Richard N. Aslin, Paavo Alku & Gergely Csibra - 2008 - Cognition 108 (3):850-855.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo