A task-oriented taxonomy of visual completion

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):780-781 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Differences and similarities between modal and amodal completions can only be understood by considering the goals of visual completion: unity, shape, and perceptual quality. Pessoa et al. cannot reject representational accounts of vision because of flaws with isomorphic representations of perceptual quality: representations and processes for perceptual quality (modal completion) and most likely dissociable from those for unity and shape (nonmodal completions)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pathological completion: The blind leading the mind?Robin Walker & Jason B. Mattingley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):778-779.
Filling-in: One or many?Luiz Pessoa, Evan Thompson & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1137-1139.
How do we see what is not there?Lothar Spillmann & John S. Werner - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):773-774.
No bridge over the stream of consciousness.Daniel C. Dennett - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):753-754.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#1,026,208)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references