David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphysica 11 (2):191-210 (2010)
The central claim of the Parfitian psychological approach to personal identity is that the fact about personal identity is underpinned by a non-branching psychological continuity relation. Hence, for the advocates of the Parfitian view, it is important to understand what it is for a relation to take or not take a branching form. Nonetheless, very few attempts have been made in the literature of personal identity to define the non-branching clause. This paper undertakes this task. Drawing upon a recent debate between Anthony Brueckner and Harold Noonan on the issue, I present three candidates for the non-branching clause.
|Keywords||Fission Non-branching Parfit Personal identity Psychological approach|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Derek Parfit (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
David Wiggins (1980). Sameness and Substance. Harvard University Press.
Derek Parfit (1971). Personal Identity. Philosophical Review 80 (January):3-27.
David Lewis (1976). Survival and Identity. In Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons. University of California Press 17-40.
Anthony L. Brueckner (1993). Parfit on What Matters in Survival. Philosophical Studies 70 (1):1-22.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher T. Buford (2008). The Psychological Approach to Personal Identity. Dialogue 47 (2):377-386.
Robert Francescotti (2008). Psychological Continuity, Fission, and the Non-Branching Constraint. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):21-31.
Anthony Brueckner & Christopher T. Buford (2008). The Psychological Approach to Personal Identity: Non-Branching and the Individuation of Person Stages. Dialogue 47 (2):377.
By Robert Francescotti (2008). Psychological Continuity, Fission, and the Non-Branching Constraint. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):21–31.
Anthony L. Brueckner (2005). Branching in the Psychological Approach to Personal Identity. Analysis 65 (288):294-301.
Harold W. Noonan (2006). Non-Branching and Circularity -- Reply to Brueckner. Analysis 66 (290):163-167.
Jiri Benovsky (2013). Branching and (in)Determinism. Philosophical Papers 42 (2):151-173.
Thomas Müller (2012). Branching in the Landscape of Possibilities. Synthese 188 (1):41-65.
Desheng Zong (2008). Three Forms of Psychological Discontinuity. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 18:103-127.
Steven Rieber (1998). The Concept of Personal Identity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (3):581-594.
Tomasz Placek (2012). On Individuals in Branching Histories. Synthese 188 (1):23-39.
Jens Johansson (2009). Francescotti on Fission. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):476-481.
Jiri Benovsky (2005). Branching Versus Divergent Possible Worlds. Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):12-20.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads24 ( #138,673 of 1,781,365 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #123,404 of 1,781,365 )
How can I increase my downloads?