The naturalness of the artificial and our concepts of health, disease and medicine
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):311-325 (2001)
| Abstract | This article isolates ten prepositions, which constitute the undercurrent paradigm of contemporary discourse of health disease and medicine. Discussion of the interrelationship between those prepositions leads to a systematic refutation of this paradigm. An alternative set is being forwarded. The key notions of the existing paradigm are that health is the natural condition of humankind and that disease is a deviance from that nature. Natural things are harmonious and healthy while human made artifacts are coercive interference with natural balance. It is suggested that the current paradigm is influenced by the world of finances and by instrumental reason. The alternative model suggests that human nature cannot be delineated. Humans fashion their own selves and nature by artificial means, medicine among them. The article discusses the implications of the paradigm adapted in various scholarly and popular debates such as the use of sex hormones for contraception, the care of the elderly, holistic medicine and distributive justice in health care. Medicine is not an isolated or a privileged realm. There is no unique entitlement to health care. It is always part of a broader agenda of social values and institutions. A open view of human societies, values and practices as they are situated within concrete material conditions is the platform required for an integrative and creative discourse of health care | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Bjørn Hofmann (2005). Simplified Models of the Relationship Between Health and Disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (5):355-377.
Wm Wildes S. J. Kevin (1999). More Questions Than Answers: The Commodification of Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):307 – 311.
Maurizio Mori (2000). The Twilight of "Medicine" and the Dawn of "Health Care": Reflections on Bioethics at the Turn of the Millennium. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):723 – 744.
Scott DeVito (2000). On the Value-Neutrality of the Concepts of Health and Disease: Unto the Breach Again. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):539 – 567.
Thomas Schramme (2007). The Significance of the Concept of Disease for Justice in Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
Jacqueline Savard (forthcoming). Personalised Medicine: A Critique on the Future of Health Care. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry:1-7.
Joachim P. Sturmberg, Carmel M. Martin & Mark M. Moes (2010). Health at the Center of Health Systems Reform How Philosophy Can Inform Policy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (3):341-356.
Marianne Boenink (2009). Tensions and Opportunities in Convergence: Shifting Concepts of Disease in Emerging Molecular Medicine. Nanoethics 3 (3):243-255.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers (2003). Key Concepts in Health Care Priority Setting. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):309-323.
Jozsef Kovács (1989). Concepts of Health and Disease. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):261-267.
Bjørn Hofmann (2002). On the Triad Disease, Illness and Sickness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):651 – 673.
George Khushf (1997). Why Bioethics Needs the Philosophy of Medicine: Some Implications of Reflection on Concepts of Health and Disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2).
Ryan J. Fante (2009). An Ontology of Health: A Characterization of Human Health and Existence. Zygon 44 (1):65-84.
William E. Stempsey (2001). Plato and Holistic Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):201-209.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-31Total downloads9 ( #113,941 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |

