David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Husserl Studies 25 (2):121-140 (2009)
I develop a “two-systems” interpretation of Husserl’s theory of belief. On this interpretation, Husserl accounts for our sense of the world in terms of (1) a system of embodied horizon meanings and passive synthesis, which is involved in any experience of an object, and (2) a system of active synthesis and sedimentation, which comes on line when we attend to an object’s properties. I use this account to defend Husserl against several forms of Heideggerean critique. One line of critique, recently elaborated by Taylor Carman, says that Husserl wrongly loads everyday perception with explicit beliefs about things. A second, earlier line of critique, due to Hubert Dreyfus, charges Husserl with thinking of belief on a problematic Artificial Intelligence (AI) model which involves explicit rules applied to discrete symbol structures. I argue that these criticisms are based on a conflation of Husserl’s two systems of belief. The conception of Husserlian phenomenology which emerges is compatible with Heideggerean phenomenology and associated approaches to cognitive science (in particular, dynamical systems theory).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Kristana Arp (1996). Husserlian Intentionality and Everyday Coping. In Thomas Nenon & Lester Embree (eds.), Issues in Husserl's Ideas Ii. 161--171.
Michael D. Barber (2008). Holism and Horizon: Husserl and McDowell on Non-Conceptual Content. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (2):79-97.
Taylor Carman (2003). Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge University Press.
Steven Galt Crowell (2002). Does the Husserl/Heidegger Feud Rest on a Mistake ? An Essay on Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology. Husserl Studies 18 (2):123-140.
Adrian Cussins (1992). Content, Embodiment, and Objectivity: The Theory of Cognitive Trails. Mind 101 (404):651-88.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Søren Overgaard (2008). How to Analyze Immediate Experience:. Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282–304.
Edmund Husserl & Marvin Farber (eds.) (1940/1968). Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl. New York, Greenwood Press.
Søren Overgaard (2003). Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
Dermot Moran (2000). Heidegger's Critique of Husserl's and Brentano's Accounts of Intentionality. Inquiry 43 (1):39 – 65.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Carlo Ierna (2008). Husserl's Critique of Double Judgments. In Filip Mattens (ed.), Meaning and Language: Phenomenological Perspectives. Springer. 49--73.
Michael R. Kelly (2008). Husserl, Deleuzean Bergsonism and the Sense of the Past in General. Husserl Studies 24 (1):15-30.
Jeffrey Yoshimi (2007). Mathematizing Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3):271-291.
Christian Lotz (2007). Cognitivism and Practical Intentionality: A Critique of Dreyfus's Critique of Husserl. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):153-166.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #27,410 of 1,102,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #192,056 of 1,102,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?