How to Refer to a Thing by a Word: Another Difference Between Dignāga's and Kumārila's Theories of Denotation [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):571-587 (2011)
In studies of Indian theories of meaning it has been standard procedure to examine their relevance to the ontological issues between Brahmin realism about universals and Buddhist nominalism (or conceptualism). It is true that Kumārila makes efforts to secure the real existence of a generic property ( jāti ) denoted by a word by criticizing Dignāga, who declares that the real world consists of absolutely unique individuals ( svalakṣaṇa ). The present paper, however, concentrates on the linguistic approaches Dignāga and Kumārila adopt to deny or to prove the existence of universals. It turns out that in spite of adopting contrasting approaches they equally distinguish between the semantic denotation of a word and its pragmatic reference to a thing in the physical world. From a purely semantic viewpoint, Dignāga considers the exclusion ( apoha ) of others by a word as the result of a conceptual accumulation of the sense-components accepted in the totality of worldly discourse. Among the three characteristics Dignāga held must be met by universals, Kumārila attaches special importance to their entire inherence in each individual ( pratyekaparisamāpti / pratyekasamavāya ). This is because he pragmatically pays attention to the use of a word in the discourse given in a particular context ( prakaraṇa ) by analyzing a sentence into a topic and a comment
|Keywords||Dignāga apoha Sense-component Kumārila pratyekasamavāya Topic and Comment Context|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Taber (2010). Kumārila's Buddhist. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):279-296.
Birgit Kellner (2011). Self-Awareness (Svasaṃvedana) and Infinite Regresses: A Comparison of Arguments by Dignāga and Dharmakīrti. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):411-426.
Birgit Kellner (2010). Self-Awareness ( Svasaṃvedana ) in Dignāga's Pramāṇasamuccaya and - Vṛtti : A Close Reading. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):203-231.
Zhihua Yao (2009). Empty Subject Terms in Buddhist Logic: Dignāga and His Chinese Commentators. Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (4):383-398.
Kiyokuni Shiga (2011). Remarks on the Origin of All-Inclusive Pervasion. Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):521-534.
John A. Taber (2005). A Hindu Critique of Buddhist Epistemology: Kumārila on Perception: The "Determinatin of Perception" Chapter of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa's Ślokavārttika. Routledgecurzon.
Anne MacDonald (2011). Who is That Masked Man? Candrakīrti's Opponent in Prasannapadā I 55.11–58.13. Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (6):677-694.
Elisa Freschi (2010). Facing the Boundaries of Epistemology: Kumārila on Error and Negative Cognition. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (1):39-48.
Mark Textor (2007). The Use Theory of Meaning and Semantic Stipulation. Erkenntnis 67 (1):29 - 45.
Christopher Gauker (2015). The Illusion of Semantic Reference. In Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On Reference. Oxford University Press 11-39.
Eric Swanson (2009). Review of Reflections on Meaning, by Paul Horwich. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 118 (1):131-134.
Dan Arnold (2010). Self-Awareness ( Svasaṃvitti ) and Related Doctrines of Buddhists Following Dignāga: Philosophical Characterizations of Some of the Main Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):323-378.
Kumārila Bhaṭṭa (2009). Ślokavārttikam of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa: With the Commentary Nyāyaratnākara of Śri Pārthasārathi Miśra: Translated Into English From the Original Sanskrit Text with Extracts From the Commentaries of Sucarita Miśra (the Kāśikā) & Pārthasārathi Miśra (the Nyāyaratnākara). Also Can Be Had From Chowkhamba Vidyabhawan.
Elisabeth Camp (2005). Review: Josef Stern, Metaphor in Context. [REVIEW] Noûs 39 (4):715-731.
Hisayasu Kobayashi (2010). Self-Awareness and Mental Perception. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):233-245.
Added to index2011-07-20
Total downloads15 ( #161,941 of 1,699,801 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,801 )
How can I increase my downloads?