The Metaphysical Neutrality of Husserlian Phenomenology

Husserl Studies 31 (1):1-15 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that Husserlian phenomenology is metaphysically neutral, in the sense of being compatible with multiple metaphysical frameworks. For example, though Husserl dismisses the concept of an unknowable thing in itself as “material nonsense”, I argue that the concept is coherent and that the existence of such things is compatible with Husserl’s phenomenology. I defend this metaphysical neutrality approach against a number of objections and consider some of its implications for Husserl interpretation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mathematizing phenomenology.Jeffrey Yoshimi - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3):271-291.
Saturation and disappointment.Ruud Welten - 2004 - Bijdragen 65 (1):79-96.
Neglecting the question of being: Heidegger's argument against Husserl.Ryan Hickerson - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (6):574 – 595.
In favor of (plain) phenomenology.Charles Siewert - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):201-220.
Apriori and world: European contributions to Husserlian phenomenology.William R. McKenna, Robert M. Harlan & Laurence E. Winters (eds.) - 1981 - Hingham, MA: distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Instincts — a Husserlian account.James R. Mensch - 1997 - Husserl Studies 14 (3):219-237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-28

Downloads
78 (#206,138)

6 months
15 (#145,565)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Epiphenomenal qualia.Frank Jackson - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (April):127-136.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press UK.
Can we solve the mind-body problem?Colin McGinn - 1989 - Mind 98 (July):349-66.

View all 31 references / Add more references