David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 18:327-339 (1993)
The purpose of this article is to determine whether analogical reasoning can supply a basis for believing that we have a moral obligation to rescue strangers. The paper will focus on donating cadaver organs. I construct a moral analogical argument involving an easy rescue case and organ donation. Various alleged relevant differences between the cases are examined and rejected. Finally, what I cal l “the ownership dilemma” is introduced and I conclude that this dilemma is inescapable. Thus, analogical reasoning, however convincing it might appear, is virtually worthless as a strategy of rationality persuading people that they have a duty to donate blood, cadaver organs, or, more generally, a duty to give up any property to aid strangers
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Snyder (2009). Easy Rescues and Organ Transplantation. HEC Forum 21 (1):27-53.
Jonathan Hughes & Tom Walker (2009). The Rule of Rescue in Clinical Practice. Clinical Ethics 4 (1):50-54.
Paulo Abrantes (1999). Analogical Reasoning and Modeling in the Sciences. Foundations of Science 4 (3):237-270.
Jeremy Bendik-Keymer (2001). Analogical Extension and Analogical Implication in Environmental Moral Philosophy. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):149-158.
N. S. Jecker (2013). The Problem with Rescue Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):64-81.
Mark Johnson (1988). Some Constraints on Embodied Analogical Understanding. In Analogical Reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Theodore M. Benditt (1982). Liability for Failing to Rescue. Law and Philosophy 1 (3):391 - 418.
Marcello Guarini (2010). Understanding Blended Multi-Source Arguments as Arguments From Partial Analogies. Ratio Juris 23 (1):65-100.
Aaron Kirschenbaum (1980). The Bystander's Duty to Rescue in Jewish Law. Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (2):204 - 226.
Paul F. A. Bartha (2010). By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments. Oxford University Press.
Dirk Schlimm (2012). A New Look at Analogical Reasoning. Metascience 21 (1):197-201.
Cynthia Koenig & Richard Griggs (2004). Facilitation and Analogical Transfer in the THOG Task. Thinking and Reasoning 10 (4):355 – 370.
Daniel C. Krawczyk, Keith J. Holyoak & John E. Hummel (2004). Structural Constraints and Object Similarity in Analogical Mapping and Inference. Thinking and Reasoning 10 (1):85 – 104.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads11 ( #156,598 of 1,679,435 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,546 of 1,679,435 )
How can I increase my downloads?