David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 86 (3):467 - 482 (1991)
Some members of the Vienna Circle argued for a coherence theory of truth. Their coherentism is immune to standard objections. Most versions of coherentism are unable to show why a sentence cannot be true even though it fails to cohere with a system of beliefs. That is, it seems that truth may transcend what we can be warranted in believing. If so, truth cannot consist in coherence with a system of beliefs. The Vienna Circle's coherentists held, first, that sentences are warranted by coherence with a system of beliefs. Next they drew upon their verification theory of meaning, a consequence of which is that truth cannot transcend what can be warranted. The coherence theory of knowledge and verificationism together entail that truth cannot transcend what can be warranted by coherence with a system of beliefs. The Vienna Circle's argument for coherentism is strong and anticipates contemporary anti-realism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
A. J. Ayer (ed.) (1978). Logical Positivism. Greenwood Press.
B. Blanshard (1938). The Nature of Thought. George Allen and Unwin.
Rudolf Carnap (1949). Truth and Confirmation. In Harry Fiegl & Wilfred Sellars (eds.), Readings in Philosophical Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts. 119--127.
Donald Davidson (1982). Empirical Content. Grazer Philosophische Studien 16:471-489.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas E. Uebel (1996). Anti-Foundationalism and the Vienna Circle's Revolution in Philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):415-440.
J. O. Young (2001). A Defence of the Coherence Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Research 26 (1):89--101.
Erik J. Olsson (2005). Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. Oxford University Press.
T. Shogenji (2001). The Role of Coherence in Epistemic Justification. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):90 – 106.
Maria Carla Galavotti (ed.) (2004). Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Charles B. Cross (1995). Probability, Evidence, and the Coherence of the Whole Truth. Synthese 103 (2):153 - 170.
Laurence BonJour (1994). Fumerton on Coherence Theories. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:103-108.
Ralph Charles Sutherland Walker (1989). The Coherence Theory of Truth: Realism, Anti-Realism, Idealism. Routledge.
Keith Lehrer (2005). Coherence and the Truth Connection. Erkenntnis 63 (3):413 - 423.
Peter Murphy, Coherentism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #99,098 of 1,102,934 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,435 of 1,102,934 )
How can I increase my downloads?