David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (3):325-334 (2012)
What is the role of self-concept in motivating moral behavior? On one account, when people are primed to perceive themselves as “do-gooders”, conscious access to this positive self-concept will reinforce good behavior. On an alternative account, when people are reminded that they have done their “good deed for the day”, they will feel licensed to behave worse. In the current study, when participants were asked to recall their own good deeds (positive self-concept), their subsequent charitable donations were nearly twice that of participants who recalled bad deeds, or recent conversation topics, consistent with an account of moral reinforcement. In addition, among participants reporting good deeds, those who did not note whether they were recognized or unrecognized by other people donated significantly more than participants who took note of others’ responses. In sum, when people are primed to see themselves as good people, who do good for goodness’ sake, not to obtain public credit, they may be motivated to do more good.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Dan Ariely & Michael I. Norton (2008). How Actions Create – Not Just Reveal – Preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):13-16.
Monica Y. Bartlett, Paul Condon, Jourdan Cruz, Jolie Baumann & David Desteno (2012). Gratitude: Prompting Behaviours That Build Relationships. Cognition and Emotion 26 (1):2-13.
Citations of this work BETA
Lawrence Torcello (2016). The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: Implications for Public Discourse. Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):19-48.
Similar books and articles
Wenyu Xie (2011). The Concept of Junzi in the Zhongyong. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (4):501-520.
E. Hulls & E. J. Robinson (1991). The Effects on Children's Moral Judgements of Time and Effort Put Into Planning. Journal of Moral Education 20 (2):205-212.
Claus Beisbart (2012). Varieties of Goodness at Work: The Relationship Between Business and Morality. Inquiry 55 (4):405-430.
Michael J. Zimmerman (2009). Understanding What's Good for Us. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):429 - 439.
Adam Morton (2009). Good Citizens and Moral Heroes. In Pedro Alexis Tabensky (ed.), The Positive Function of Evil. Palgrave Macmillan
Milena Ivanova (2010). Pierre Duhem's Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):58-64.
Walter E. Schaller (1992). The Relation of Moral Worth to the Good Will in Kant's Ethics. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:351-382.
Wilfried Ver Eecke (2007). The Concept of Merit Good in Economic Theory. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:181-186.
Allen W. Wood (2003). The Good Will. Philosophical Topics 31 (1/2):457-484.
Michael P. Maratsos (2004). People Actually Are About as Bad as Social Psychologists Say, or Worse. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):351-352.
Jenny Teichman (2003). Good for and Good About. Philosophy 78 (1):115-121.
Charles R. Pigden (2012). Identifying Goodness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):93 - 109.
Jennifer Welchman (1999). The Virtues of Stewardship. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):411-423.
Added to index2012-09-09
Total downloads21 ( #153,466 of 1,780,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #203,623 of 1,780,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?