On the Confusion between Ideal and Non-ideal in Recent Debates on Global Justice
Political Studies 58 (3) (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRoland Pierik & Wouter Werner (2005). Cosmopolitism, Global Justice and International Law. The Leiden Journal of International Law 18 (4):679-684.
Gillian Brock (2005). The Difference Principle, Equality of Opportunity, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):333-351.
Christian Barry & Pablo Gilabert (2008). Does Global Egalitarianism Provide an Impractical and Unattractive Ideal of Justice? International Affairs 84 (5):1025-1039.
Marcus Arvan (2008). A Nonideal Theory of Justice. Dissertation, University of Arizona
James P. Sterba (2005). How to Achieve Global Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 1 (1):53 – 68.
Gillian Brock (2004). What Does Cosmopolitan Justice Demand of Us? Theoria 51 (104):169-191.
Gillian Brock (2005). Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
Sebastian Lutz (2009). Ideal Language Philosophy and Experiments on Intuitions. Studia Philosophica Estonica 2:117-139.
Robert Jubb (2012). Tragedies of Non-Ideal Theory. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (3):229-246.
Chris Armstrong (2009). Global Egalitarianism. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):155-171.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-02-27Total downloads96 ( #6,738 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
