David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (8):843-860 (2012)
This article contributes to studies in democratic theory and civic engagement by critically reflecting on the role of contemporary art for the transformation of the public sphere. It begins with a short assessment of the role of art during the Enlightenment, when the communicative function and the public role of art were most clearly articulated. It refers in particular to the analogies between aesthetic and political judgement in order to understand the emancipatory role of artistic production within a philosophical project centred on reason’s capacity to liberate itself from the dogmatism of authority and from the errors of superstition, both elements considered crucial to the development of a functioning public sphere. The article then discusses the historical transformation of art following a number of philosophical and sociological critiques to a similar project of the Enlightenment and assesses the attempt of historical avant-gardes to appropriate this critique yet maintain art’s emancipatory function in society. Having examined some problems raised by these attempts, the article turns to the analogies with contemporary artistic production. It examines the role of contemporary visual art in the public sphere and shows how the anti-rationalist theories articulated to reflect on contemporary works of art, and the works themselves, both fail to develop art’s emancipatory role in society. Without rethinking artistic experience in a way that places emphasis on reason’s capacity for critical and constructive self-understanding and without reconsidering art theory in a way that brings back the emphasis on the emancipatory role of rational communication, contemporary art, far from contributing to the revitalization of the public sphere, will contribute to its decline
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kathleen Kadon Desmond (2011). Ideas About Art. Wiley-Blackwell.
Katherine Anne Willyard, Heidegger, Art and Politics: Exploring the Notion of Truth That Can Be Revealed Through a Work of Art in Relation to the Political Sphere.
Caroline Levine (2002). The Paradox of Public Art: Democratic Space, the Avant-Garde, and Richard Serra's "Tilted Arc". Philosophy and Geography 5 (1):51 – 68.
Nick Riggle (2010). Street Art: The Transfiguration of the Commonplaces. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (3):243-257.
Nicolas Whybrow (2011). Art and the City. Distributed in the U.S. And Canada Exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan.
Bridget Fowler (2003). A Note on Nick Zangwill's `Against the Sociology of Art'. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):363-374.
Krzysztof Ziarek (2004). The Force of Art. Stanford University Press.
Donald Kuspit (1995). Art and Capital: An Ironic Dialectic. Critical Review 9 (4):465-482.
Aaron Smuts (2005). Are Video Games Art? Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
Samantha Matherne (2013). The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant's Aesthetic Ideas. British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):21-39.
Keith Lehrer (2011). Art, Self, and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Lotte Philipsen (2012). The Myth of Emancipation Through Interaction. On the Relationship Between Interactive Dimensions and Emancipating Potentials of Contemporary (Digital) Art. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 23 (43).
Grant H. Kester (2011). The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context. Duke University Press.
Added to index2012-08-15
Total downloads24 ( #165,381 of 1,911,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,144 of 1,911,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?