Hypatia 17 (1):107-129 (2002)
|Abstract||: This comparative study of the ethics of care and the Confucian concept of jen argue against two assumptions made by Chenyang Li in his own study of these two traditions. Against him, I argue that a "feminine" morality is not adequate to address human equality, and that care-orientated theories like jen and care seem incompatible with the feminist commitment to oppose the subjection of women|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chenyang Li (2008). Does Confucian Ethics Integrate Care Ethics and Justice Ethics? The Case of Mencius. Asian Philosophy 18 (1):69 – 82.
Marian A. Verkerk (2001). The Care Perspective and Autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):289-294.
Fiona Robinson (2011). The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Temple University Press.
Howard J. Curzer (1993). Fry's Concept of Care in Nursing Ethics. Hypatia 8 (3):174 - 183.
Chenyang Li (2002). Revisiting Confucian. Hypatia 17 (1).
Daniel Star (2002). Do Confucians Really Care? A Defense of the Distinctiveness of Care Ethics: A Reply to Chenyang Li. Hypatia 17 (1):77-106.
Chenyang Li (1994). The Confucian Concept of Jen and the Feminist Ethics of Care: A Comparative Study. Hypatia 9 (1):70 - 89.
Chenyang Li (2002). Revisiting Confucian Jen Ethics and Feminist Care Ethics: A Reply to Daniel Star and Lijun Yuan. Hypatia 17 (1):130 - 140.
Maurice Hamington (2009). Liberté, Égalité, Sororité. Social Philosophy Today 25:123-135.
George G. J. Agich (1999). The Importance of Management for Understanding Managed Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (5):518 – 534.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,504 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?