A critique of foundationalist conceptions of comprehensive doctrines in the religion in politics-debate
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (1):11 - 28 (2009)
This paper comprises a critical examination of foundationalist conceptions of comprehensive doctrines in the religion in politics-debate. I argue that John Rawls, the towering figure of this debate, operates with a foundationalist conception of comprehensive doctrines that has shaped the debate’s view of relevant alternatives (often referred to as exclusivism and inclusivism). However, there are several problems with foundationalist conceptions, and the most serious is that they are empirically inadequate in relation to modern Western societies. I conclude that participants of the exclusivist/inclusivist debate ought to look closer at alternative, non-foundationalist conceptions, and I supply a brief sketch of one such approach, inspired by American pragmatism.
|Keywords||Rawls Comprehensive doctrines Religion in politics Exclusivism Inclusivism Pragmatism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Audi (1989). The Separation of Church and State and the Obligations of Citizenship. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (3):259-296.
Steven Fesmire (2003). John Dewey and Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics. Indiana University Press.
Martha Craven Nussbaum (1990). Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press.
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Michael Sandel (2003). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University. 336-343.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Burleight T. Wilkins (1997). A Third Principle of Justice. Journal of Ethics 1 (4):355-374.
Tyler Krupp (2008). Genealogy as Critique? Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):315-337.
Philip Kitcher (2011). Militant Modern Atheism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):1-13.
Roy W. Perrett (1997). Religion and Politics in India: Some Philosophical Perspectives. Religious Studies 33 (1):1-14.
Frederic Volpi (2002). Pragmatism and 'Compassionate' Political Change: Some Implications of Richard Rorty's Anti-Foundationalist Liberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (5):537-557.
Richard B. Davis (1995). The Principlism Debate: A Critical Overview. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):85-105.
David Shatz (1986). Circularity and Epistemic Principles: A Reply to James Keller. Synthese 68 (2):369 - 382.
Peter H. Hare (ed.) (2009). International Perspectives on Pragmatism. Cambridge Scholars Pub..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #89,249 of 1,410,108 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #57,890 of 1,410,108 )
How can I increase my downloads?