David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 26 (1):41-66 (2003)
This article reexamines the rational choice or economic approach to human studies. Its adherents claim that its extension beyond its original domain to all human behavior can finally lead to integration of the human studies, especially social theory, and thus their elevation from what they see as a chaotic state. Specifically, they propose grounding human studies on the premise that humans are rational egoists or self-interested utility maximizers. Although this premise has been the conceptual foundation of orthodox economic theory, it has been questioned, and even in part discredited in its heterodox versions. This reexamination casts serious doubts on such claims.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Modern Philosophy Philosophy of the Social Sciences Political Philosophy Sociolinguistics|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jon Elster (1986). Ulysses and the Sirens. Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1):82-95.
Michael Hechter (1992). Should Values Be Written Out of the Social Scientist's Lexicon? Sociological Theory 10 (2):214-230.
Thomas J. Fararo (1993). General Social Equilibrium: Toward Theoretical Synthesis. Sociological Theory 11 (3):291-313.
M. Blaug (1964). Economic Theory in Retrospect. Science and Society 28 (1):112-115.
Dennis C. Mueller (1982). Public Choice. Ethics 92 (3):560-561.
Citations of this work BETA
J. Jeffrey Tillman (2008). Sacrificial Agape and Group Selection in Contemporary American Christianity. Zygon 43 (3):541-556.
Similar books and articles
Edward F. McClennen (1990). Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge University Press.
Stanley Kelley (1995). The Promise and Limitations of Rational Choice Theory. Critical Review 9 (1-2):95-106.
Debra Friedman & Michael Hechter (1988). The Contribution of Rational Choice Theory to Macrosociological Research. Sociological Theory 6 (2):201-218.
Robert E. Lane (1995). What Rational Choice Explains. Critical Review 9 (1-2):107-126.
Michael Taylor (1995). Battering RAMs. Critical Review 9 (1-2):223-234.
Alan Donagan (1987). Choice, the Essential Element in Human Action. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ross Poole (1992). Living with Reason. Inquiry 35 (2):199 – 217.
Amparo Gómez Rodríguez (2008). Rational Choice Theory and Economic Laws: The Role of Shared Values. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):191-205.
John Dupré (1998). Against Reductionist Explanations of Human Behaviour: John Dupré. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):153–172.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #163,836 of 1,725,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,161 of 1,725,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?