David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
If one comes to Phénoménologie de la perception after having read Sein und Zeit (or Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs) one will be in for a surprise. Both works contain a number of both implicit and explicit references to Husserl, but the presentation they give is so utterly different, that one might occasionally wonder whether they are referring to the same author. Thus nobody can overlook that Merleau-Ponty’s interpretation of Husserl differs significantly from Heidegger’s. It is far more charitable. In fact, when evaluating the merits of respectively Husserl and Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty often goes very much against the standard view. This is not only the case in his notorious remark on the very first page of Phénoménologie de la Perception where he declares that the whole of Sein und Zeit is nothing but an explication of Husserl’s notion of Lifeworld, but also - to give just one further example - in one of his Sorbonne-lectures, where Merleau-Ponty writes that Husserl took the issue of historicity far more seriously than Heidegger.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. Reuter (1999). Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Pre-Reflective Intentionality. Synthese 118 (1):69--88.
Alia Al-Saji (2009). An Absence That Counts in the World: Merleau-Ponty’s Later Philosophy of Time in Light of Bernet’s 'Einleitung'. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40 (2):207-227.
M. C. Dillon (1971). Gestalt Theory and Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Intentionality. Man and World 4 (4):436-459.
Ted Toadvine (2002). Merleau-Ponty's Reading of Husserl. In Ted Toadvine & Lester Embree (eds.). Kluwer. 227-286.
Hiroshi Kojima (2002). Merleau-Ponty's Reading of Husserl. In Ted Toadvine & Lester E. Embree (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. 95-113.
Leonard Lawlor (2002). Verflechtung: The Triple Significance of Merleau-Ponty’s Course Notes on Husserl’s 'The Origin of Geometry'. In , Maurice Merleau-ponty: Husserl at the limits of phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Sara Heinämaa (1999). Merleau-Ponty's Modification of Phenomenology: Cognition, Passion and Philosophy. Synthese 118 (1):49-68.
Dan Zahavi (2002). Merleau-Ponty's Reading of Husserl. In Ted Toadvine & Lester E. Embree (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. 3-30.
Thomas M. Seebohm (2002). The Phenomenological Movement: A Tradition Without Method? Merleau-Ponty and Husserl. In Merleau-Ponty's Reading of Husserl. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Sean D. Kelly (2005). Seeing Things in Merleau-Ponty. In C. Tarman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads144 ( #4,293 of 1,089,127 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #24,213 of 1,089,127 )
How can I increase my downloads?