David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):453 – 471 (2007)
In his recent book The Stream of Consciousness, Dainton provides what must surely count as one of the most comprehensive discussions of time-consciousness in analytical philosophy. In the course of doing so, he also challenges Husserl's classical account in a number of ways. In the following contribution, I will compare Dainton's and Husserl's respective accounts. Such a comparison will not only make it evident why an analysis of time-consciousness is so important, but will also provide a neat opportunity to appraise the contemporary relevance of Husserl's analysis. How does it measure up against one of the more recent analytical accounts?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael R. Kelly (2009). The Consciousness of Succession. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1):127-139.
Joseph Glicksohn (2001). Temporal Cognition and the Phenomenology of Time: A Multiplicative Function for Apparent Duration. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):1-25.
Robin Le Poidevin (2004). A Puzzle Concerning Time Perception. Synthese 142 (1):109 - 142.
Jane Chamberlain (2002). Thinking Time. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:281-299.
Curtis M. Hutt (1999). Husserl: Perception and the Ideality of Time. Philosophy Today 43 (4):370-385.
Barry F. Dainton (2000). Stream of Consciousness: Unity and Continuity in Conscious Experience. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads103 ( #8,082 of 1,011,903 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #28,090 of 1,011,903 )
How can I increase my downloads?