David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):331-350 (2006)
Punishment is punishment even if it is not (perceived by the punisher to be) deserved. But punishment which is not (perceived by the punisher to be) fitting is not punishment. This paper explores the differences between desert and fittingness, and argues that incorporating fittingness into thedefinition of punishment is not problematic, whereas incorporating desert in such definition is, in contrast, infamously problematic. The main difference between these two notions turns on the interesting differences between two types of normativity. Fittingness is exclusively concerned with aesthetic normativity, whereas desert is more directly concerned with moral normativity. When something is fitting, then it is, to an extent, intrinsically good, and, to an extent, it is also beautiful. The notion of fittingness has largely been ignored in discussions of punishment, yet it helps us better to understand the phenomenon of punishment, and in particular the thorny relationship between this phenomenon and desert. Key Words: beauty desert fittingness normativity punishment retributivism.
|Keywords||beauty normativity retributivism punishment desert fittingness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. T. Nuyen (2008). Moral Luck, Role-Based Ethics and the Punishment of Attempts. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):59-69.
Benjamin Vilhauer (2013). Persons, Punishment, and Free Will Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 162 (2):143-163.
Matt King (2012). Moral Responsibility and Merit. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2).
Stephen Kershnar (1999). Objections to the Systematic Imposition of Punitive Torture. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):47-56.
J. L. A. Garcia (1989). Deserved Punishment. Law and Philosophy 8 (2):263 - 277.
Stephen Kershnar (2005). Giving Capitalists Their Due. Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):65-87.
Thom Brooks (2004). Retributivist Arguments Against Capital Punishment. Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):188–197.
Howard Simmons (2010). Moral Desert: A Critique. University Press of America.
J. Angelo Corlett (2003). Making More Sense of Retributivism: Desert as Responsibility and Proportionality. Philosophy 78 (2):279-287.
J. Angelo Corlett (2001). Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #51,549 of 1,008,729 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,702 of 1,008,729 )
How can I increase my downloads?