Parsimony and the triple-system model of concepts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):230-231 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Machery's dismissive position on parsimony requires that we examine especially carefully the data he provides as evidence for his complex triple-system account. We use the prototype-exemplar debate as an example of empirical findings which may not, in fact, support a multiple-systems account. We discuss the importance of considering complexity in scientific theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideological parsimony.Sam Cowling - 2013 - Synthese 190 (17):3889-3908.
Parsimony Arguments in Science and Philosophy—A Test Case for Naturalism P.Elliott Sober - 2009 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 83 (2):117 - 155.
Triple bottom line – a vaulting ambition?Jan Tullberg - 2012 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 21 (3):310-324.
When is parsimony a virtue.Michael Huemer - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):216-236.
Kuhnian values and cladistic parsimony.Richard Richards - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (1):1-27.
Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”.Chris MacDonald - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):243-262.
Quantitative parsimony.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):329-343.
Instrumentalism, parsimony, and the akaike framework.Elliott Sober - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S112-S123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
51 (#306,042)

6 months
15 (#159,128)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joe Cruz
Williams College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references