Noûs 40 (4):591–622 (2006)
|Abstract||In this paper, the author shows how one can independently prove, within the theory of abstract objects, some of the most significant claims, hypotheses, and background assumptions found in Kripke's logical and philosophical work. Moreover, many of the semantic features of theory of abstract objects are consistent with Kripke's views — the successful representation, in the system, of the truth conditions and entailments of philosophically puzzling sentences of natural language validates certain Kripkean semantic claims about natural language.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward N. Zalta (2001). Fregean Senses, Modes of Presentation, and Concepts. Philosophical Perspectives 15 (s15):335-359.
Stephen K. McLeod (2008). How to Reconcile Essence with Contingent Existence. Ratio 21 (3):314-328.
Edward N. Zalta (2006). Essence and Modality. Mind 115 (459):659-693.
M. McKeon (2005). A Defense of the Kripkean Account of Logical Truth in First-Order Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (3):305 - 326.
Edward N. Zalta (1995). Two (Related) World Views. Noûs 29 (2):189-211.
A. Sierszulska (2006). On Tichy's Determiners and Zalta's Abstract Objects. Axiomathes 16 (4).
Edward N. Zalta (1999). Natural Numbers and Natural Cardinals as Abstract Objects: A Partial Reconstruction of Frege"s Grundgesetze in Object Theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):619-660.
Bernard Linsky (2005). Remarks on Platonized Naturalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):3-15.
Edward N. Zalta (2000). Neo-Logicism? An Ontological Reduction of Mathematics to Metaphysics. Erkenntnis 53 (1-2):219-265.
David J. Anderson & Edward N. Zalta (2004). Frege, Boolos, and Logical Objects. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (1):1-26.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #74,716 of 549,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?