David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In A. Hieke (ed.), Ernst Mally - Versuch einer Neubewertung. Academia Verlag (1998)
In this paper, the author compares passages from two philosophically important texts and concludes that they have fundamental ideas in common. What makes this comparison and conclusion interesting is that the texts come from two different traditions in philosophy, the analytic and the phenomenological. In 1912, Ernst Mally published *Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Logik und Logistik*, an analytic work containing a combination of formal logic and metaphysics. In 1913, Edmund Husserl published *Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie*, a seminal work in phenomenology in which noemata are defined and given a crucial role in directing our mental states. In the passages from these two texts reproduced below, the author shows that the abstract `determinates' postulated by Mally in 1912 are assigned much the same role that Husserl assigned to noemata in 1913. Though Mally's determinates are not as highly structured as Husserl's noemata, they have a feature that explains how they manage to play the role assigned to them. The corresponding feature is missing, or at least, not emphasized in Husserl's account of noemata. Therefore, insights from both philosophers, and thus from both the analytic and phenomenological traditions, are needed to give a more complete account of directed mental states.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Edward N. Zalta (2006). Deriving and Validating Kripkean Claims Using the Theory of Abstract Objects. Noûs 40 (4):591–622.
Similar books and articles
Søren Overgaard (2008). How to Analyze Immediate Experience:. Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282–304.
Elisabeth Ströker (1993). Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
Jeff Kochan (2011). Husserl and the Phenomenology of Science. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (3):467-471.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Shaun Gallagher (2005). Phenomenological Contributions to a Theory of Social Cognition. Husserl Studies 21 (2):95-110.
Edward N. Zalta (1992). On Mally's Alleged Heresy: A Reply. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):59-68.
Lilian Alweiss (2009). Between Internalism and Externalism: Husserl's Account of Intentionality. Inquiry 52 (1):53 – 78.
R. O. Elveton (1970). The Phenomenology of Husserl. Chicago,Quadrangle Books.
G.-J. C. Lokhorst & L. Goble (2004). Mally's Deontic Logic. Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):37-57.
Wojciech Krysztofiak (1995). Noemata and Their Formalization. Synthese 105 (1):53 - 86.
Added to index2009-02-11
Total downloads10 ( #154,022 of 1,101,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #191,891 of 1,101,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?